News
Calendar
Pressroom
CV
Biography
Pictures
Books
Articles
Top10 Lists
Contact
Links

In Defence of Global Capitalism
 
Globalisation is Good



Latest:

2010-06-14
Ny bok: Fragment & Argument 1990-2010. Till salu hos Adlibris och Bokus.

More news ->


 


2010-09-07    
Search the site with Google:

 
 
      

GlobLog - October 2005
A direct link to each entry is obtained by using the button below the entry.


Monday, 31/10/2005:

14:31 - WHY I DONīT ALLOW COMMENTS ON THE BLOG: 

Some purists say that this is not a blog since I donīt allow comments from the readers. That doesnīt bother me the least. They sound like the French classicists who said that Victor Hugoīs Hernani wasnīt drama because it didnīt follow the "unity of place". I do this because I think itīs a good idea, not to fit someoneīs definition.

But since I have been challenged by Chadie to open up for dialogue on the blog, Iīd like to explain why I donīt. I have tried it before, and the comment section was quickly and repeatedly filled with dirty words, hate mail and even threats, often from racists and the extreme left. And I donīt have the time to moderate it and get rid of the worst things, much less to reply. It works if you have few readers and few opponents bent on destroying the forum. But for me, I canīt even respond to all the email I get as it is.

So in other words, I am not opposed to a dialogue, but I donīt see the point of multiple monologues at once. Instead I continue like this, listen to reactions, respond to other blogs, and react to (and quote) some of the email, here on the blog.




Sunday, 30/10/2005:

16:13 - AN IMPORTANT BLOG: 

I have recommended Hans Rosling before, a professor in international health who educates us all about the worldwide improvement of living standards. Now he has started a very promising blog, and he starts off by showing that UNICEF has a 20 year old image of Bangladesh.

And check out his animated statistics at Gapminder.




Saturday, 29/10/2005:

14:16 - OFF TO SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE: 

Now I am going to Turkey for a week, and won´t respond to email meanwhile. Despite the slightly better offer from the EU, I wouldn´t be surprised if the WTO negotiations have broken down when I return. France is behaving worse than ususal.

By the way, here is a good point about Turkey, from the Czech president Vaclav Klaus:

"I am convinced that the European Union should be open to any country willing and ready to participate in the European integration process...

I am also in favour of Turkey’s membership in the EU because I am strongly against the very problematic concept of an ´ever closer Europe´. I don’t want uniformity, ´one-for-all´ size of institutional and legal rules and principles, excessive homogenization of the continent, cultural conformity and dependence. I am, therefore, ready to invite Turkey into the EU for egoistic reasons – I welcome the entry of a big, culturally diverse, in some respects truly different country to be a part of the EU dispute about its future..."




00:54 - READ THIS BEFORE YOU SURRENDER TO CHIRAC, III: 

"The increase in exports of [agricultural] goods from developing countries would be a huge $191 billion per year more [in case of full trade liberalisation]. Certainly Latin America accounts for a large part of that increase, but all regions’ exports expand and even low-income countries would sell an extra $36 billion worth of such goods per year (an increase of 52 percent).

Hence for merchandise trade as a whole, developing countries would sell an extra $318 billion to high-income countries under free trade whereas high-income countries would sell an extra $290 billion to developing countries."

- A World Bank study by Kym Anderson, Will Martin & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, estimating that total world income gain from free merchandise trade would be $287 billion - four times the total amount of foreign aid given every year.



Friday, 28/10/2005:

16:12 - LINDERBORG AGAIN: 

As you know, Åsa Linderborg is not too careful with the truth in her crusade against the US. Today she claims that Time Magazine supported Suhartoīs mass murders. Michael Moynihan shows convincingly that either she has not read the Time article, or she is lying.

Linderborg has a Ph.D. in history. Who taught her criticism of oneīs sources?




15:36 - READ THIS BEFORE YOU SURRENDER TO CHIRAC, II: 

"But there is clear progress in one little-noticed [CAP] area: transparency. Last Thursday -- after much pushing and prodding and not without a fight -- Belgium became the latest EU member state to reveal who gets what from the CAP. Surprise, surprise: The main beneficiaries are large agribusinesses that shouldnīt need taxpayer-funded handouts, not those small farmers "struggling to survive" so often cited by subsidy defenders.

Here are some enlightening facts about the €546 million that Belgium divided among 399 recipients last year:

• The largest recipient, Raffinerie Tirlemontoise, a sugar refiner based in Brussels, received €91.9 million -- more than the bottom 378 recipients combined. The RT Group, as the company is also known, is part of the Südzucker AG Group -- which, according to its Web site, is īthe biggest sugar group in the European Union.ī [...]

• Ninety percent of Belgiumīs subsidies went to just 29 firms. That includes such mom-and-pop operations as Campina, the European dairy cooperative, which received more than €24.5 million. Just missing the cut for the top 29 were Tate & Lyle (more than €6 million, in addition to the £127 million it received in Britain), BASF (€1.2 million) and Nestlé (just over €1 million)."

- Wall Street Journal, 26 October



11:20 - READ THIS BEFORE YOU SURRENDER TO CHIRAC, I: 

"The CAP currently transfers money away from the poorer eastern member states to some of the EU´s richest members, including Ireland and France. If the CAP were abolished and the funds currently spent on it were returned to the member states in proportion to their contributions, the biggest beneficiaries would be Estonia, Cyprus and Hungary, which would benefit to the tune of about 0.3% of their GDP.

The CAP costs the new member states far more than the UK rebate does. For example, last year Hungary paid €200m more into the EU budget to finance the CAP than it received back in agriculture spending. This is four times bigger than Hungary´s contribution to the UK rebate, which was about €50m last year."

- Neil O´Brien, from the new reform think-tank Open Europe




Thursday, 27/10/2005:

14:00 - VIDAREBEFODRADE VANDRINGSHISTORIER: 

"De första rapporterna från New Orleans vid orkanen Katrina talade om 10.000 döda. De upprepades också av politiker och polis. Efteråt har det visat sig att antalet döda blev ca 1.000...
 
I New Orleans påstods flyende kvinnor ha blivit våldtagna och spädbarn ha mördats. Detta bekräftades också av New Orleans borgmästare. Nu efteråt visar det sig ha varit vandringshistorier. Politikerna hade ett behov av att visa att de visste vad som skedde, men hade i själva verket ingen annan information än medierna, som utan källkritik vidarebefordrat uppgifterna. Vi andra som kommenterade vad som hänt trodde naturligtvis på den eniga bild som politiker och media gav."

- Olle Wästberg förklarar i sitt nyhetsbrev varför han skrev som han gjorde om New Orleans i Svenska Dagbladet för en och en halv månad sen.



11:45 - HUR HAR VI KLARAT OSS UTAN DETTA?: 

De nya tjänsterna från Bosse Ringholm (Tack Majed)



08:52 - AXIS OF PROTECTIONISM: 

Today the EU leaders meet to smooth over differences of opinion between Blair´s modernisers and Chirac´s protectionists. For some reason, the more childish and unconstructive French politicians are, the more other countries try to please them. Unfortunately, Blair has now begun to agree about the need for a "globalisation fund" to help workers adapt to restructuring. If done in the right way, this is precisely the kind of sensible idea that does not make sense at the EU level. Just do it yourself, if it´s a good idea.

The elephant in the meeting room that no one wants to talk about, is that the EU is right now destroying the World Trade Organisation, by not  offering real reforms of the CAP. France is of course worst, with a president who talks loud and hypocritically about the problems of world poverty while he vehemently defendes a protectionist policy that kills (pdf) people every day.

But the following EU countries also support France´s obstructions. If you live there, use this last opportunity to protest and write to your politicians, who will go down in history as those responsible for a failure that will hurt Europe and the world´s poor.

Axis of protectionism:

Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
Estonia
Finland
France
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Lithuania
Luxemburg
Poland
Portugal
Spain

CORRECTION 2005-11-09: I was wrong to include Estonia on this list. Luckily, it is still a free trade-country. Sorry, Estonians!




Wednesday, 26/10/2005:

16:03 - SKUGGE TAR TILLBAKA PÅ BLOGGEN MEN ENVISAS I PAPPERSTIDNINGEN: 

Alla gör misstag. Det är inget konstigt med det. Men sedan finns det två sorts människor: De som ser rättelser som ett sätt att lära sig mer om världen, och som därför inte är rädda för motargument, och därför gärna ändrar sig när de har hört mer fakta. Och så finns det de som inte gör det. I medievärlden är tyvärr det senare vanligt, där journalister och tidningar tycks tro att det är ett nederlag att erkänna ett misstag.

Linda Skugge verkar tillhöra den senare sorten. Hon skrev häromveckan att alla på Timbro var homofober och abortmotståndare. I den efterföljande debatten på sin blogg erkände hon att hon inte kom på en enda person på Timbro som var homofob (eller abortmotståndare), och berömde tvärtom timbroiter som mig och Mattias Svensson som kämpat för liberala åsikter i denna fråga.

I lördagens krönika hade hon chansen att ta tillbaka påståendet även för en bredare allmänhet. Tvärtom upprepar hon då plötsligt vad hon skrivit, och låtsas att det låg något i det genom att blanda ihop Timbros åsikter med moderaters och kristdemokraters åsikter.

Hon vet att hon har fel och rättfärdigar sin felaktiga generalisering med påståendet: "Jag generaliserar exakt så som högern jämt gör om oss feminister." Andras felaktiga påståenden blir alltså en ursäkt för att själv föra fram felaktiga påståenden. Snacka om race to the bottom.




11:19 - A REAL AMERICAN HERO: 

 


The bus driver shouted, "Aren´t you going to stand up?"

 "No," she replied.

 "Well, I´m going to have you arrested," he declared.

 "You may do that," was Rosa Parks´ calm response.

- The simple dialogue on a public bus in Alabama December 1955  that started the civil right´s movement and led to the disintegration of institutionalised racism in the American south. The modest hero, Rosa Parks, died Monday night, 92 years old.




Tuesday, 25/10/2005:

23:54 - GREEN CHINA?: 

One of my points in In Defence of Global Capitalism was there are big environmental problems, but that we need more, not less wealth to deal with them. If you don´t afford food and clean water, you won´t afford to care about nature. And I also say that poor countries will deal with these problems earlier in their development than we did, because they can learn from our mistakes, and they can use the cleaner technology that we have developed.

Now compare that thesis to this graph from the latest The Economist:






17:12 - IN A COUNTRY RULED BY THE TALIBANS 4 YEARS AGO: 

"Afghanistan´s 249-member parliament will have a higher percentage of women - 27.3 per cent - than many western ones, including the UK (19.7 per cent) and the US (15.2 per cent), according to Inter-Parliamentary Union data."

- Financial Times



12:18 - SURFING THE CLOUDS: 

Right now I am flying over England, on my way home from the US. And since SAS is the first airline to offer wireless high-speed connection in all passenger classes on all transcontinental flights, I just had to try it before it becomes commonplace - and possibly a bit annoying. Because unfortunately, this will make it harder to say: "Sorry, I couldnīt read it, I was on the plane."

But for the moment, I am just enjoying the wonders of technology. I love it.




Sunday, 23/10/2005:

20:56 - VAD TIMBRO INTE FÅR KORRIGERA PÅ DN DEBATT: 

Mats Bergstrand har förklarat att Timbro inte får någon replik på Tiina Rosenbergs artikel på DN Debatt. Jag förstår hans allmänna kritik mot alla som begär slentrianrepliker utan att tillföra något i sak. Men i det här fallet blir det märkligt eftersom Rosenberg målar upp en bild av att Timbro skulle förfölja henne som person, baserad på följande direkt falska påståenden:

1) Hon påstår att Susanna Popovas Bonnier Fakta-bok Elitfeministerna var finansierad av Timbro.

2) Hon hävdar att Popova var "Timbros utsända" när hon kritiserade Anna Wahl.

3) Hon felciterar Timbros följebrev till Och världen skälvde, för att få det att se ut som ett hot.

4) Hon påstår att Johan Tralau är "Timbroanknuten".

5) Hon skriver att homofobi legat bakom kritiken mot henne. Hon skriver inte direkt att Timbro skulle ha gjort sig skyldigt till det, men eftersom hon skriver att "Alla vägar tycks leda till Timbro och Svenska Dagbladets ledarsida" så kletar onekligen den beskyllningen av sig på Timbro och SvD. I så fall, varför inte ge ett enda exempel på när dessa givit uttryck för homofobi?

Det är lite väl många falska påståenden för att vara ett misstag. Om Rosenberg bedriver forskning som hon skriver debattartiklar förstår jag kritiken mot henne som forskare. Som jag tidigare har skrivit är jag övertygad om att hon medvetet ljuger för att svartmåla sina kritiker. Hon kan inte vara så här totalt oinformerad.

Problemet med att Timbro inte får korrigera dessa påståenden på DN Debatt är att Rosenbergs lögner kommer att sjunka in i det allmänna medvetandet. De som skriver historien kommer att hitta hennes artikel, men inte dessa korrigeringar.

Får man i all välmening föreslå att DN Debatt i alla fall startar ett webbforum, där repliker som inte får plats i papperstidningen kan publiceras? Det kanske skulle tvinga personer som Rosenberg att argumentera för sina påståenden.



17:55 - WILL THE LEFT LISTEN TO BOLIVIAN WORKERS THIS TIME?: 

Bolivian workers march on the US Embassy to demand Boliviaīs immediate entry into the free trade agreement the Andean nations are negotiating with the US. (via the Neocon blog)




Saturday, 22/10/2005:

23:48 - SEATTLE 1.3: 

I am in the US for a couple of days, and won´t respond to email. But I have been asked what I think about the WTO negotiations, and thought I would share my thoughts.

The much discussed generous offer from the US on agriculture is better than expected, but not much. The offer to cut tariffs and subsidies are not really about tariffs and subsidies, but ceilings, and they are much higher than the real tariffs and subsidies. And "trade distorting" subsidies are often just rebranded. According to Oxfam, the US offer would just cut agricultural spending from $74.7 billion a year to $73.1.

However, EU has not matched this offer, and countries like Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and Norway are also eager to block moves towards free trade in food. The real villain is France - which has attacked the EU response for being too generous, and stops trade commissioner Mandelson from negotiating seriously. For French politicians, including supposedly market-liberal ones like Nicolas Sarkozy, it´s much more important to pander to wealthy, unproductive farmers, than to reduce world poverty and increase global wealth. I am ashamed of belonging to a European Union that lets them get away with it.

Once again, rich countries sacrifice development because they don´t dare to stand up to their special interests. And once again, developing countries refuse to accept it. It happened in Seattle and it happened in Cancun. It looks like Hong Kong will be Seattle 1.3.

UPDATE 2005-10-23 23:48: I wrote Seattle 2.2. But Seattle was 1.1, Cancun was 1.2, so this has to be Seattle 1.3.




Friday, 21/10/2005:

13:08 - SOMETHING NEO: 

 
I am often asked what I am going to do when I leave Timbro. Well, I am going to do a lot of different things, and I don´t yet know all of them. But when I do, I´ll let you know.
 
One of the things I know I am going to spend a lot of time doing is the forthcoming Swedish magazine NEO. This is a new, stylish magazine for those of us who like freedom, rationality, progress and the good life - and intellectual discussions about them. I think of it as the (now demolished) sky bar of the Chrysler building meets The Economist meets an art nouveau-café.
 
I will be a contributing editor and a member of the advisory board. Check it out, and subscribe here.



12:32 - RÄTT KVINNA PÅ RÄTT PLATS: 

Jag föreläste just för drygt tusen företagare i Göteborg om vad vi ska göra av den internationella konkurrensen, och efteråt blev jag utfrågad av Lars Adaktusson. Han frågade vad jag ska rösta på. Jag är ju inte helt säker, men jag avslöjade i alla fall min hemliga dröm för att få ordning på politiken:

S-regeringen hade ju en vice statsminister som skulle lägga ett jämställdhetsperpsktiv på alla frågor. Jag skulle vilja se Maud Olofsson som vice statsminister, med uppgift att lägga ett skaparperspektiv på alla frågor. Maud, som är den mest engagerade förespråkaren för företagsamhet av partiledarna, skulle fungera som en grindvakt. När departementen skickar fram ett visst förslag ska hon kunna säga att detta är nog bra och vettigt i sig, men det gör det faktiskt lite, lite svårare för landets skapare och entreprenörer, så det går rakt ned i papperskorgen. Punkt slut.

Bara det går i uppfyllelse kan regeringen sen se ut hur som helst.



07:53 - ITīS THE ECONOMY STUPID: 

The Economist quotes a new UN report, Forests and floods: drowning in fiction or thriving on facts?, which says that deforestation is not to blame for floods. Trees can apparently only reduce the effect of drizzly rain over small areas, and has no effect on major floods. And neither can tree roots do anything about landslides of more than a meter´s depth. It seems like the reason we notice more floods is not environmental devestation, but economic growth:

"Towns and cities have long been established on flood plains, despite the risk of periodic flooding. This is because the numerous social and economic benefits of living near water tend to outweigh the risk. Historically, such settlements have clung to the higher ground on the flood plain. But as towns and cities have grown, new housing estates and commercial zones have been built on ever more flood-prone areas...

In reality, the huge economic losses attributed to flooding in recent years are mainly a reflection of economic growth, increased investment in infrastructure and rapidly growing flood plain populations. Floods are no more frequent today than they were 120 years ago, when lush forests were abundant. The problem is just that more people now live and work on flood plains."




Thursday, 20/10/2005:

22:58 - DEBATTEN OM MIN MILJÖRAPPORT: 

Min rapport om att svenskar har missat framstegen var gäller utveckling och miljö har fått mycket uppmärksamhet på landets ledarsidor, om än inte alls på nyhetsplats. Och en anledning till att debatten inte har blossat upp på allvar är att jag inte har fått några egentliga mothugg. Motståndarna har varit tysta som graven. Det enda jag har hört från miljövänner är några som håller med om riskerna med att larma ihjäl sig och att inte ta åt sig äran för de förbättringar som har skett.

Däremot har en del synts i bloggosfären vilket jag inte har hunnit svara på eftersom jag varit på andra sidan jordklotet, och i morgon far jag till USA på en knapp vecka, så jag kommer inte att vara så väldigt tillgänglig då heller. Men jag tycker att alltid saklige Andreas Bergh på ett föredömligt sätt har sammanfattat invändningarna - och vad jag skulle ha svarat.

Jag har hört ytterligare en invändning, nämligen att jag har gjort ett skevt urval frågor. Jag tar ju bara upp de områden som har förbättrats, och inte de nya problemen, som t ex utfiskning och växthuseffekt. Men detta var ju min poäng, att det har skett väldiga framsteg vad gäller klassiska miljöproblem och att ingen har berättat om det för folk. Och i rapporten skriver jag att det alltid kommer nya - jag nämner just utfiskning och växthuseffekt - och att vi inte kommer att förstå hur vi hanterar dem om vi inte förstår hur vi hanterade de gamla problemen.

Bergh nämner en egen tänkbar invändning, att Värlsdbankens fattigdomsbegrepp är kontroversiellt. Det är jag den förste att instämma i, men jag har valt det för att jag ville använda officiella siffror som används av så många som möjligt. Men det finns mycket att invända åt båda håll, och på marginalen skulle jag gissa att Världsbankens mått överdriver fattigdomen i världen. Om det har jag skrev jag för två år sedan denna understreckare.




Wednesday, 19/10/2005:

09:58 - PLAYING PLAYING THE ANGEL: 



Jonas Morian once compared us Depeche Mode-fans to social democrats - whatever they do, we always buy their new stuff, even though we constantly complain that they used to be much better. Stop complaining. The new album is really, really good, darker, with stronger melodies and more classical electronic sounds. Here is my top 5 for the moment:

1. The darkest star
2. Suffer well
3. John the Revelator
4. A pain that I´m used to
5. Lillian

So Precious, Damaged people and Nothing´s impossible don´t even make the top 5. Now that´s a good album.




08:37 - A PAYRISE FOR EUROPEAN COWS: 

I often use the figure that a European cow gets $2 a day in subsidies - more than the average income of 2.7 billion people around the world. Now things have changed. Europe´s cows have had a pay rise. Oxfam´s calculations show that they used to get $2.20 a day, but in 2003, they got $2.62. (via Alex Singleton)




Tuesday, 18/10/2005:

17:36 - FAREWELL TO ARMS: 

The first Human Security Report has been published by Oxford University Press. And human security is improving. Here are some highlights:

 
– In 1950, the average armed conflict killed 38,000 people; in 2002 the figure was 600, a 98% decline.

– The number of armed conflicts around the world has declined by more than 40% since the early 1990s.

– The number of genocides and politicides plummeted by 80% between 1988 and 2001.

– There were just 25 armed secessionist conflicts under way in 2004, the lowest number since 1976.

– The dollar value of major international arms transfers fell by 33% between 1990 and 2003.

– The number of refugees dropped by some 45% between 1992 and 2003, as more and more wars came to an end.

As the report points out – and as I pointed out in my new report on development and the environment – the media has missed the progress, since dramatic stories are more interesting than long-term trends. But perhaps that is changing. Today, Swedish televion presented the findings of this report. (Thanks Kristian)




14:07 - NYANSERAD SKUGGE: 

Linda Skugge fortsätter att nyansera sig, och tycker t ex om min gamla kritik mot moderaternas motstånd mot att homosexuella får adoptera. Nu påstår hon inte längre att timbroiter skulle vara homofober, utan kritiserar allmänt borgerliga krafter för att allt för sällan ha kämpat för liberala värderingar i sådana frågor.

Och då har jag inte längre något att invända. Det har hon alldeles rätt i, och det är något jag och mina nyliberala kompanjoner har klagat över i 15 år.



10:29 - BACK ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GLOBE: 

As you might have guessed from the recent activity on this blog, I just got back from my around the world-trip to New Zealand and Australia (it took 36 hours to get back, I´m glad I brought a book). Now I´m home a few days before I go to the US, and then home a few days before I go to Turkey. I really enjoyed the two countries downunder, and not just the wonderful Lord of the Rings-tour. I was amazed by their interest in globalisation. I got the impression that I talked to every single journalist there, and that every paper portrayed me and published excerpts from my lecture.

I am impresed by the work of everybody at The Centre for Independent Studies, the efficient and very welcoming think-tank that arranged the whole trip. Greg Lindsay founded it in 1976, and he still runs it with vision and a great sense of humour, able to influence both sides of the political spectrum. If you get a chance to go to one of their meetings in the future, take it.

CIS also used the occasion to publish another version of In Defence - the Australasian. Improved and updated with local examples by April Palmerlee and Gaurav Sodhi, and designed by Carolynn Chen.
 
                                                              



08:40 - ROSENBERG - IGEN: 

Jag har fått frågan om det inte trots allt kan vara så att Tiina Rosenberg ärligt missuppfattade följebrevet till Och världen skälvde som ett hot. Jag tror inte det, eftersom missuppfattningarna i så fall är lite för många: 

1. Varför tog hon bort orden “hoppar av” när hon citerade följebrevet till boken i DN-artikeln, för att få det att se ut som ett hot? Det låter som att hon förstår att det inte är det så länge de orden är med.

2. Varför skriver hon att Johan Tralau är Timbroanknuten när han inte är det?

3. Varför skriver hon att Timbro skulle ha finansierat Popovas Bonnier Fakta-bok Elitfeministerna när det inte är sant?

I mina öron låter allt detta som en ytterst beräknande person, som har bestämt sig för att använda sitt avhopp till att nita en politisk motståndare genom att måla upp en konspirationsteori, utan att bry sig om vilken relation påståendena har till verkligheten.



Monday, 17/10/2005:

19:07 - THE MAN WHO WAS PROVEN RIGHT: 

On the 6th of August 1980, Arthur Seldon presented this brave prognosis in The Times:

"China will go capitalist. Soviet Russia will not survive the century. Labour as we know it will never rule again. Socialism is an irrelevance."

Seldon died last week, aged 89. But he lived long enough to see that he was completely right. And one of the reasons was his own pioneering work for free markets and liberalism at the Institute of Economic Affairs.




14:17 - MAKING THE LISTS: 

Prospect and Foreign Policy just announced the results of their Global public intellectuals poll. Over 20 000 people voted, and Chomsky, Eco, Dawkins, Havel and Hitchens made the top five. Very flattering for me is the "bonus ball" nominations, where voters could nominate names they thought should have been included on the original list of 100 nominated intellectuals. I am No 7, right after Bill Clinton and Joseph Stiglitz, and just ahead of Dalai Lama and Thomas Sowell.

On a very different list I am No. 23, after singer Jessica Simpson, and in a tie with reality-show actress/model Natacha Peyre. This list is not about global public intellectuals, though. It´s about the people most often mentioned on Swedish blogs. You might have guessed that from the "Biography" on Peyre´s website. It has a different character from the bios of people like Havel and Dalai Lama:

Name: Natacha Peyre
Lives: Stockholm, Sweden
Size: 34
Height: 164 cm.
Bust: 85 cm.
Waist: 60 cm.
Hips: 85 cm.
Shoes: 36 eur
Hair: Blonde
Eyes: Brown



13:44 - SKUGGES SAMMANBLANDNING: 

På sin blogg går Linda Skugge från att angripa Timbro för att vara homofobt till ett betydligt mildare påstående: Att vi inte tillräckligt ofta skriver om våra liberala åsikter om homosexualitet. Det är ju något helt annat. Jag hatar ju inte maltwhisky bara för att jag inte ofta skriver om att jag älskar det.

Men av sammanhanget förstår man också var hennes missuppfattning kommer ifrån. När hon skriver om Timbro tänker hon inte på Timbro, utan på "mörkblå människor" i moderaterna.  Men Skugge är mer moderat än jag, så det vore väl mer logiskt att jag angrep henne för de åsikterna än att hon angriper mig för dem?
 
Om Skugge behöver ammunition i kampen mot sina nya mörkblå vänner kan hon mer fördel läsa denna gamla Smedjanartikel av mig som angriper moderat homofobi.



10:37 - WHAT MAKES US HAPPY: 

Americans are happier than Europeans. I am trying to explain why and what it says about wellbeing research in an op-ed in Los Angeles Times.



10:20 - JAG KEDJEBLOGGAR: 

Nu sägs det att bloggar är ute, bara därför att vi har sett avhopp från kändisbloggare som hoppade på trenden för att det var en trend. På det viset får bloggar gärna vara ute. Konsolidering kallas det. Det är ungefär som när IT-bubblan pyser ut, samtidigt som Internet och e-handel tar fart på riktigt.

På SVT Opinions kedjeblogg uppmärksammas just nu bloggare som bloggar för att de tycker att de har något att säga, inte för att det är trendigt. Denna vecka skriver jag om nationalism.



Sunday, 16/10/2005:

20:50 - MAIL TILL LINDA SKUGGE: 

Hej Linda,
 
Med anledning av vad du skriver i dagens Expressen: Jag har jobbat på Timbro i sex år, och är själv anhängare av fri abort, homosexuellas rätt att adoptera och emot att man ger sina barn en hurring.

Under dessa sex år har jag aldrig hört att någon på Timbro har meddelat någon annan åsikt i dessa frågor. Därför undrar jag vem det var du tänkte på när du skrev att vi på Timbro "verkar samtliga vara homofoba abortmotståndare som tycker att det är bra att ge sina barn en hurring".

Dessutom är jag nyfiken över varför du "är extra nöjd över det jag skrev om Timbro", vilket du skriver på din blogg.

Med vänliga hälsningar
Johan Norberg



13:41 - HAVENīT YOU READ ANYTHING BY HAROLD PINTER?: 

Then why not read this statement from the International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic, where Pinter is vice chairman, brought to my attention by Smedjan/Sticket:

"The ICDSM condemns the unconstitutional and illegal abduction of president Milosevic and his delivery to the Hague ´tribunal´ as an attack on Yugoslav sovereignty carried out by the USA, NATO and their Serbian puppets. The ICDSM demands the immediate release of president Milosevic from his illegal detention in the Hague and the abolition of the illegitimate so-called ´International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia´ as an extension of NATO and a tool used against the resistance of freedom fighters and patriots."

I don´t know if his support of the fascist Serbian mass murderer (or his defence of Castro) is the reason why Pinter gets the Nobel Prize in literature, but it follows a modern tradition of awarding authors who hate liberal democracy and the free market.



13:18 - DOES BUSH SPEND LIKE CLINTON OR LIKE A DRUNKEN SAILOR?: 

In an interesting post Tino Sanandaji writes that President Bush is not the great spender that libertarians and limited government conservatives claim. As a proportion of GDP, both Nixon and Johnson outspent him. However, I think agree with Katallaxi that it is more interesting to look at the absolute increase in absolute spending, rather than adjusting it for change in GDP. Otherwise we assume that it is natural to increase spending as incomes rise, and rapid growth would hide rapid spending increases. (Thanks Kristian)

Another interesting fact is that no matter how you count, Bill Clinton seems to be the best one of recent presidents when it comes to spending. One important reason, of course, was that the Republican Congress restrained him. Republicans are good - as long as they are in opposition.



Saturday, 15/10/2005:

07:23 - REPORT FROM NEW ZEALAND: 

New Zealand is another very nice and welcoming country. And it has also gone through a remarkable change to get ready for globalisation. From 1984 and until the early 1990s, the almost isolationist economy was opened rapidly, and the country went from having the 30th to the 3d freest economy in the world. Instead of stagnation New Zealand got healthy growth rates and almost another half a million new jobs on net - which is a lot in a country of 4 million.

New Zealand has done one thing in particular that Europe should try - it abolished protection and subsidies for agriculture. And what happened when farmers began producing for consumers instead of the government? It increased agricultural productivity by 1 percent a year, and actually raised agricultureīs share of the total economy - from 14 percent in 1986-87 to 16.6 percent in 1999-2000.

And thanks to low taxes, deregulation, non-unionised labour, and the fantastic landscape, New Zealand was a perfect location to shoot the Lord of the Rings, and now it is one of the worldīs leading countries in filmmaking.



Friday, 14/10/2005:

13:13 - KORRIGERING OM TIINA ROSENBERG: 

Vänta förresten. Efter att jag skrivit det förra kommer jag plötsligt på hur extraordinärt sjukt detta är egentligen. Jag var alldeles för vänlig när jag skrev att Tiina Rosenberg kanske missförstått det. Vad tror hon egentligen att det betyder om hon får ett följebrev till en filosofisk roman, som lyder:

"Hej Tiina!

Det här är en bok som handlar om en frustrerande tillvaro där den ena efter den andra hoppar av och försvinner. En situation som förmodligen inte är helt obekant.

Trevlig läsning!"

Det är faktiskt inte tänkbart att hon på allvar tolkar det som ett hot om att hon ska försvinna. Tror hon att vi ska gå på att hennes bild av Timbro är att vi sätter oss ned och funderar på hur vi ska bemöta hennes åsikter och kommer fram till att det bästa är att ta fram Timbros brevpapper och skicka ett mordhot med vänliga hälsningar? Så korkad kan hon inte vara.

No way. Hon ljuger. Hon har bestämt sig för att hoppa av, men eftersom hon inte vill underblåsa den allmänna bilden att det är ett feministiskt inbördeskrig som sliter sönder Fi så passar hon i stället på att smutskasta politiska motståndare på nedrigast tänkbara vis. Det är faktiskt riktigt, riktigt smutsigt.





12:34 - OM TIINA ROSENBERG : 

Eftersom jag är på andra sidan jordklotet har jag inte sett Tiina Rosenbergs DN Debatt om att hon lämnar Fi förrän nu. Det finns två viktiga saker att säga med anledning av den:

1) Det är ett hot mot demokratin om personer som Rosenberg utsätts för hot på grund av kontroversiella och/eller knäppa åsikter. Och vi vet att det förekommer. De som hotar, och trakasserar politiska motståndare underminerar den civilisation som fria meningsutbyten innebär, och vi bör alla fördöma och bekämpa dem.

2)
Hennes påstående att Timbro skulle ha hotat henne är bortom allt förstånd. Jag har själv varit inblandad i kampanjen för Ayn Rands roman "Och världen skälvde" där fler än 50 offentliga personer har fått personliga följebrev som på ett humoristiskt vis förklarar varför den boken har något att säga just dem. Det är fullkomligt orimligt att på något vis tolka lustifikationen om folk som hoppar av och försvinner som något annat än just en välvillig drift med att flera av Fi:s grundare har hoppat av.

Det vet nog Rosenberg också, varför skulle hon annars förfalska Timbrocitatet när hon berättar om det, så att det ska låta som ett hot? Läs Mattias Svenssons svar här.
Och hennes kritik i övrigt tycks handla om att hon inte gillar att hennes åsikter kritiseras och granskas. Men det får man faktiskt tåla i en demokrati.

Just för att hot är så kränkande och obehagliga är det oerhört allvarligt att påstå att politiska motståndare gör det. Om Rosenberg har missförstått följebrevet bör hon korrigera sitt misstag. Om hon medvetet har ljugit bör hon skämmas.




04:27 - DIFFERENCES DOWNUNDER: 

Some things never change despite globalisation - the fascination for local celebrities, for example. In Australia, several of the journalists were interested in the fact that I am a fan of the Australian musician Nick Cave. One of the biggest papers even asked me what I thought that Cave would think of my political views.

And here in New Zealand, two journalists have asked me about my fascination for New Zealand´s Peter Jackson, director of the Lord of the Rings-movies. I like that. It´s nice to get to talk about Cave and Jackson for a change, and not just about Smith and Rand.

I noticed another interesting difference when it comes to regulations of night life. In Sydney, it is extremely difficult for new competitors to get a license to start a new restaurant, bar or club, and apparently almost no one under 40 has a bar. And here in Auckland a lot of places have a BYO-license - bring your own alcohol...




Wednesday, 12/10/2005:

07:18 - REPORT FROM THE 22ND BONYTHON LECTURER: 

Yesterday I delivered the Annual John Bonython Lecture in Sydney, in front of a very kind and welcoming audience of about 400 Australians. It was about why almost everything gets better, and why no one believes me when I say so. A transcript is available on the website of the Centre for Independent Studies. There has been a lot of media attention, and I particularly like the fact that when I read the national daily The Australian this morning, it had me on the front page, in the news section AND on the op-ed page. I should get me a subscription...

Tonight I am off to New Zealand.





Tuesday, 11/10/2005:

03:30 - THIS IS A WARNING: 

Sydney must be one of the most beautiful places on earth, particularly where the botanical garden meets the sea and the opera house, and there are scyscrapers everywhere in the background. Judging from my first impression the Australians are also extraordinarily welcoming, liberal and tolerant. I just had an interesting conversation with a taxi driver about the benefits he thought that globalisation has brought Australia.

Australia has a very interesting story to tell. The very regulated economy was deteriorating in the 1970s and early 1980s, but then a series of liberal and labour governments liberalised and opened the economy. They introduced private pension accounts two decades ago, and turned from protectionism to free trade. Since then, Australia has grown rapidly and unemployment has been halved. And the positive circle continues with more liberal reforms. It is now the 7th freest economy in the world. With this optimistic and global mindset, Australia is very well placed to benefit even more from globalisation.

This is a warning: In the future, you will hear more from me about the Australian example.




Saturday, 8/10/2005:

12:17 - BEATING MR FOGG: 

Right now I am in Singapore for a few hours, on my journey around the world in 10 days: Stockholm-London-Singapore-Sydney-Auckland-Los Angeles-Stockholm. Isn´t modern ways of travelling a miracle? I manage to beat Jules Verne´s Phileas Fogg by 70 days, and still have the time to deliver several lectures, travel around in Australia and New Zealand, and - most important of all - go on a Lord of the Rings tour in New Zealand.



Thursday, 6/10/2005:

10:33 - ONLINE: 



Now my report on Swedish beliefs about the environment - Rubriker som gör oss rädda - is available online (only in Swedish).




01:12 - THE GREATEST STORY OF OUR TIME - AND WE MISSED IT: 

Today I present a Demoskop survey in Dagens Nyheter. It shows that Swedes haven´t learned about the rapid environmental progress in Sweden and Europe since 1980. Big majorities think that all the eight indicators we ask about have worsened, when they have in fact all improved rapidly.

At 9.00 I launch the report at a press meeting at Timbro, where I explain why the media has contributed to this exaggerated pessimism.




Wednesday, 5/10/2005:

18:44 - ENJOY THE SILENCE: 

You might have noticed that I donīt reply to email right now. I have far too many projects to finish before I leave for Australia and New Zeeland, and there is total chaos in my mail box, so that will have to wait. Sorry.




15:10 - DONīT MISS FRIHETSFORUM: 



In case you have no plans this weekend, and happen to be close to Stockholm: Go to Frihetsforum, 7-9 October. This Freedom Forum is a big and broad event with individualist, liberal, social liberal and libertarian groups and individuals who present, discuss and debate ideas on how to change the world.

I won´t be there since I will be in Australia then. So don´t miss this chance to go there and to tell me at next year´s forum that I am a looser because I missed the fantastic inaugural event of 2005.




Tuesday, 4/10/2005:

23:02 - FREE RADICAL: 

I have received so many well-wishes and congratulations since I wrote that I am leaving Timbro that I haven´t found the time to respond yet. But let me just say: thanks. The fact that so many - from all corners of the world - care about my activities is really moving, and encourages me more than I can express in a few words.

Let me also assure those of you who are afraid that this will mean that I won´t be as active as before in the struggle for liberalism and capitalism that you are wrong. My plan is that this will make me more productive and more active in the future. This is what I want to spend my life fighting for. Yes, I am stubborn. I can´t help it. As Oliver Wendell Holmes once said:

"Man´s mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimension."



Monday, 3/10/2005:

11:12 - LABOUR MARKET MOBILITY: 

I just informed my colleagues at Timbro, the Swedish free-market think-thank, that I am leaving Timbro at the end of the year.

I have been here in different capacities for six years now. It is the best place on the planet to develop independent thoughts and ideas without having to be confined to what’s considered politically possible or useful for the moment. I can’t imagine a better place to grow as a person and as a thinker, and I am happy for all the young Swedish liberals who have the same experience ahead of them.

If the ideas of liberalism and capitalism are to be influential, we need more places and institutions like Timbro.

The fact that I am leaving is a proof of how successful this think-tank has been. My work and my six books for Timbro have established me in the debate, and the last one is a global bestseller – soon published in 20 different countries. This makes it possible for me to become a free-lance liberal, devoting all my time and energy to writing books, articles, reports and lectures for different people and organisations. Yes, I am now open to suggestions.

Personally I want to move more from day-to-day politics to ideas for the long-term, and from a Swedish to a more global perspective and audience. With only one year left to the next general election in Sweden, and everybody’s minds fixed upon this, it is more natural for me to do it as an independent.

But most of all, I take this step because I want to spend my days in cafés, with a laptop, my iPod, a copy of the Economist and all those books that I never find the time to read.



Sunday, 2/10/2005:

20:22 - A RESPONSE: 

In Svenska Dagbladet today two representatives from Attac Sweden reply (pdf) to Johan Forsselīs and my article about the problematic anti-poverty campaign. Apart from the fact that they have missed that I am in favour of debt cancellation, they say that nothing shows that democracy, free markets and free trade promotes development, and that this is why the campaign does not embrace it.

Thatīs what you would expect from them. But thatīs not what I expect from center-right politicians like Lars Leijonborg, Göran Hägglund and Maud Olofsson who signed the platform with Attac and others. I really wonder what they think today when they read this outspoken and revealing defence of their common platform.




08:49 - WHO ARE THE WORLDīS LEADING PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS?: 

Prospect and Foreign Policy asks you to vote here. You decide wheter people like Bhagwati, De Soto, Lomborg and Vargas Llosa make the list, or names like Chomsky, Hobsbawm, Klein and Negri.




08:40 - ANOTHER RELEVANT EASTERLY QUOTE: 

"Letting total aid money stand for accomplishment is like the Hollywood producers of Catwoman, recently voted the worst movie of 2004, bragging about their impressive accomplishment of spending $100 million on its production."
- Wiliam Easterly again (pdf)



Saturday, 1/10/2005:

17:35 - DEVELOPMENT QUOTES OF THE DAY: 

"If all of us are collectively responsible for a big world goal, then no single agency or politician is held accountable if the goal is not met. Collective responsibility for world goals work about as well as collective farms in agriculture, and for the same reason."
- William Easterly (via PSD Blog)

By the way, the UNDP, one of those big world goal-institutons, might just agree:

"The currency of pledges from the international community is by now so severely debased by non-delivery that it is widely perceived as worthless."
- UNDP: Human Development Report 2005, p 40.




17:11 - VAD VAR DET JAG SADE?: 

Jodå, stalltipset om Ekots bloggkrönika stämde mer än väl. 3 av 4 citerade bloggar var i dag uttalat liberala. I dag var det dags att rädda konceptets trovärdighet. En hårdare gir har man väl sällan sett:

vecka 1:    0%

vecka 2:    0%
vecka 3:    0%
vecka 4:    75%

Intressant nog tillhör de två första citerade bloggarna i dag, Faler och Ljungkvist, de som skarpast har kritiserat Bloggkrönikans politiska snedvridning. Jag kommer på tre tänkbara förklaringar till att just de citerades:

a) Slump, b) ett försök att vinna kritikerna med smicker, eller c) Ekot har verkligen inte koll på bloggosfären, utan har upptäckt dessa bloggare eftersom de har fått kritik från dem. Den sista förklaringen skulle också bidra till att förstå det skeva politiska urvalet: Det är inte så att Ekot har velat välja ut endast vänsterbloggar - det är bara det att de inte känner till några andra.



 

Send this page to a friend
Adapt this page for print
 


For technichal inqueries regarding this site, please contact webmaster@johannorberg.net